Our discussion on ancient graffiti was broadened my understanding and definition of graffiti. In discussing the readings and case studies of graffiti in the ancient world, I came to realize that each definition offered a different perspective on graffiti’s properties, many of which contradicted the others. Is graffiti defined by its location? By its visibility? By its implied viewership? Is it a ritual act, defined by gesture and the event of its making? Is it ephemeral, in this performative sense, or is it lasting “evidence”? Is it inherently communicative, or is its meaning only produced by the author’s intent? Does graffiti define space? Does space define graffiti? How do legality and commissions relate to graffiti?
The readings for this class and the discussion which followed illuminated the multiplicities of definitions. Just as Deconstructionist theory attempts to find meaning, but discovers that meaning is deferred infinitely, perhaps we might reconcile the elusive nature of “defining” graffiti.