Selling Eliteness to Prospective Students
Colby is undoubtedly an elite institution, but it is easy to lose sight of that fact when you become an insider and Colby just becomes your “normal.” As an intern for the Office of Admission here at Colby, I am constantly promoting the school to prospective students and families. What I have now come to realize, though, is that in promoting our professors, labs, dorms, alumni, and more, I am actually selling our eliteness. Given this, I have decided to look into how Colby promotes its eliteness through the Admissions information session without ever saying the word elite or referring to our rankings. Specifically, I have looked at the information session script through a Bourdieusian framework and identified how theories of field and capital—specifically social and cultural capital— are strategically utilized to promote our eliteness.
Social capital refers to one’s network of connections that they are able to leverage. Social capital is evoked in numerous ways throughout the information session, the main one being in relation to our alumni network. The information session reminds students that, regardless of the path they take after Colby, they will “join a global network of more than 20,000 alumni in over 90 countries who serve as leaders and influencers across all industries.” This is essentially stating that the students will leave with an immense amount of social capital solely given their status as a Colby graduate. The script goes on to emphasize how these connections can be leveraged, which is the other important element of social capital. One anecdote that exemplifies this utilization of alumni connections is that “two Colby students recently designed and produced their own show that was workshopped in New York City during Jan Plan, thanks to a connection with one of our 20,000+ alumni.”

In addition to social capital, the Colby information session also emphasizes the cultural capital that one inevitably gains as a Colby student. Cultural capital refers to one’s familiarity with the “legitimate” culture and how their tastes, mannerisms, language, etc. reflect that familiarity. One of the major areas in which this is evoked by the information session script is in reference to the museum. “We believe our Museum of Art is the finest college art museum in the country,” the script claims, a statement that is supported by listing several of the well-known artists it features such as Zao Wou-ki, Marsden Hartley, Picasso, Whistler, Alex Katz, and O’Keefe. Students are bound to interact with these works as “the Museum serves as an extraordinary resource for a diverse array of departments and programs” and is utilized by over one-hundred courses in our catalog.
Beyond this, cultural capital is also gained through the global experiences offered at Colby. In the spiel about Davis Connects, we state that “we believe that every Colby student should have access to a meaningful research experience, internship, and global experience.” These experiences promoted by Davis Connects are offered in addition to the two hundred plus study abroad programs that about seventy percent of students take advantage of. Together, these experiences contribute to the “inherently global experience Colby is known for” and therefore help students gain cultural capital through increased exposure to and knowledge of the international community.
Finally, the Admissions information session script sells our eliteness by situating Colby in relation to other elite schools or within the elite “field.” According to Bourdieu, a “field” is a setting in which agents and their social positions are located that is structured internally in terms of power relations. There are two references to our relationships with, and, specifically, our impact on, other elite schools around the country which serve to place us in the same field as them. First, in a discussion of our computational biology major, the script states that our interdisciplinary computation program, or CS + X, has served as a model for similar programs at other colleges and universities such as Stanford.
Later on, in a discussion of our Center for Arts and Humanities, the script points out that our digital humanities labs have been replicated by other colleges and universities such as Dartmouth. Although in both of these cases there were probably also some less elite schools that replicated these initiatives, the script intentionally cites well-known, elite colleges as being inspired by Colby to place us in the same field as them. Between these references to the field of elite colleges to which we belong as well as examples of the ways Colby provides its students with the opportunity to develop their social and cultural capital, the Admissions information session script is successful in selling Colby as an elite institution without using the term “elite” or citing our rankings.


