Contradictions as Findings
Recently, our group finished the process of condensing codes into themes and writing our group paper outline. As we condensed codes into themes, our group chose “Glocal Tensions” and “Elite Western Identification” as our two central pillars within narrative findings. The majority of our codes for our collective analysis of student, teacher, and alumni interviews were “Western Influence” and “Glocal.” These two codes allowed us to quickly highlight findings that led us to our central ideas for our future research paper. However, our theme “Glocal Tensions” became increasingly more complex as we found contradictions within the data.
These contradictions manifested in the form of answers to various questions in the interviews that surrounded descriptions and analysis of individual’s identities at Olive Grove and the school’s identity as an institution of elite education in Jordan. When coding my student interview, the student stated that he is Jordanian and identifies with many of the Jordanian students at Olive Grove. He said that social circles are comprised of students with many different nationalities and interests; however, he described all of these identities as existing within a Jordanian context. The student argued that the school’s location in Jordan and the many Jordanian and Middle Eastern students affect much of the social and cultural interactions. I coded these descriptions as “Local Influence.” Addressing the global influence and impact of Olive Grove, the student retorted that the school’s identity as an institution within the Middle East is affected by the geography and cultural context rather than the mixed demographic and global self-identification. However, the teacher within another interview argued a different perspective. The teacher represented a Western background—hailing from a suburb in Massachusetts. He argued that the school’s identity in recent years has been cemented as “Global.”

Furthermore, the teacher justified this through the mixed student body and complex web of cultural identities at Olive Grove. He did not highlight the location within Jordan as a major factor within the school’s identity besides the geography’s relationship to student trajectories after Olive Grove. The student focused more on his personal identity as Jordanian and his history with the location surrounding Olive Grove while the teacher projected his own experience working abroad and chose to underline the cultural mixing as a sign of global and international identity.
Inevitably, I classified these contradictions as “Glocal Tensions.” These varied answers regarding the identity of Olive Grove and its student body represent an important paradox. On one hand, students who represent a local demographic analyze their experience at Olive Grove through that lens. Conversely, teachers and alumni who represent a background outside of Jordan or the Middle East project their own identity unto the potentially “global” identity of the school itself. It is difficult to discern which perspective determines the identity of Olive Grove. However, I believe these contradicting viewpoints serve as the real truth behind the institution’s self-identification—an identity struggling to combine their Middle Eastern geography and western influence.








