Hard Science and Social Science

Professor Noh’s presentation: “How current genomes are shaped by evolutionary pasts” was interesting and insightful. It is always a treat to have Colby professors lead these lectures, especially when it is a professor that Ihave never had any contact with. I have never taken a biology course at Colby so it was nice to hear from someone that I am so far removed from. That being said, since I have never taken biology class at Colby and the last time I took biology was early high school, I had a hard time following along. She broke down some of the terminology, however there was still many concepts that I did not understand and had trouble wrapping my head around. I probably should have asked some questions, however I was at that point where I had so many little questions that I couldn’t even come up with an insightful question to ask.

I must say, it must be difficult for Professor Noh to create a presentation for students and faculty that have little to no experience in biology. In most places where she presents her work, I’m sure she has a group of biology students and faculty who are very well aware of the implications of her research and the background knowledge to understand the research. This, however, was different in the fact that she had a room full of mixed majors, many humanities, and many students who have never taken a biology or similar course at Colby. So, being that she was able to share her research with us and us understand it (for the most part) was very impressive, and I am in awe of that skill.

One topic she brought up was how competition between amoebas drive a genetic modification and affects evolution. Although I was unfamiliar with amoebas, I found it interesting when she related it to social conflict, a topic that I do talk about often in my sociology and education classes. She discussed how social conflict within the body changes how amoebas form, creating different DNA sequences. Since I had a hard time picturing what was happening in the body with these small organisms, I pictured this in the way that I knew how to understand it, with social groups in a society.

Although I had trouble following along, I thought it was intriguing that this research she was doing, which would typically be considered a hard science, can be translated to humanities. Many of our other lectures have been clear social science and literary studies topics, but this biology discussion was also related in the fact that it supported evolution and changes over time. She discussed just how adaptive organisms can be  to their environments, such as dicty changing in size over a small period of time. Although this is very different, our last lecture also discussed how species can adapt to their environments, but that talk being humans and this being much much much smaller organisms. Still, it relates, and comparing and contrasting all the information from multiple lectures provides new insights to these ideas that we are learning throughout the semester.

“Dicty” and Working Together

This week’s lecture from Professor Suegene Noh was about Genomes and the link between the humanities and sciences of genetics and biology. I haven’t taken a Biology course in a while but was still able to understand the majority of points she brought up just because she did an excellent job breaking down terminology and concepts with very basic explanations. That being said I wasn’t able to understand everything that was said just simply because I did not know what some of the things discussed were. However, it is just truly mindboggling to even consider the type of work she has done and can do with technology nowadays to be able to read such enormous amounts of DNA sequences in such an extraordinary pace.

 

I also thought it was particularly interesting to hear that the majority of research done into “Dicty” had been using the same lab samples for decades. I figured almost every experiment would typically go and retrieve a wild sample for testing and learning this was common practice to just continue new studies and tests using the same sample or strain was surprising. Specifically in dealing with fields like genomics this seemed really counterproductive because each individual sample should have unique variations to study. This made me wonder how many other things show up in tests that are often using the same samples from previous studies and therefor generalizing often about species and organisms.

 

This being said I think research like this is especially important because we have this new and incredible technology at our hands and are now able to learn so much about the DNA sequencing of all organisms. I can see this field expanding rapidly and becoming one of the more sought after and discussed topics in the near future. It is also interesting to consider this in terms of our presence of the past theme. As Professor Noh proved with this study, Dicty work together to form multicellular organisms and this is an obviously recurring theme throughout history and it is especially relevant in our modern age as well. There are countless examples throughout history of people working together to fight for a just cause or just to fight for survival and it is always true that working together is the best way to solve large issues or to simply improve.

 

I think this is really intriguing to consider on a global scale since microscopic organisms such as Dicty really make up so much of our planet. We still have so many species we have yet to discover and it is amazing to learn so much from such small organisms. Again tying this back into the humanities it is almost poetic because we have an absurd amount of humans and therefor-human interactions throughout our lives. Considering this fact in relation to the idea that working together is always the best way to improve our world, it becomes clear that with the correct motivation and the right cause we could do some extremely incredible things if we all worked together.

Social Conflict and Gene Expression

Professor Suegene Noh’s talk, titled “How Current Genomes are Shaped by Evolutionary Pasts”, acted as a catalyst between the disciplines of genetics and biology in conjunction with the humanities. Much of her discussion explored how science and technology can inform our culture’s ways of thinking, describing, and understanding biological basis of change. Specifically, Professor Noh explored the ways in which social involvement of social pressures influence the biological selections for or against certain organisms, or specific traits expressed by those organisms. This discussion specifically has allowed me to question the influence of social involvement on gene expression. As concluded in her talk, “genes induced by social conflict show evidence of positive selection”. This talk showed vast similarities to a course I currently take that focuses on the connections between biology, society, and addictive behaviors. I am thinking about the importance of social interaction, and in this case conflict, on processing ability and acceptance into society. The knowledge that the brain controls many biological substrates of gene expression that directly correspond to behavior allows me to believe that gene expression is influenced heavily both in regards to the “nature”, but also very much by the “nurture” of life.

Continue reading “Social Conflict and Gene Expression”