The concept of false confessions when thought into deeply can unveil many intricacies in the psyche and approaches that seek to exploit it. Initially, one might think Why would I lie saying I committed a crime? But it is far more complicated than that. There are many factors that play into the phenomena of false confessions which modern psychological science has dissected. In an episode of the Bear Brook podcast, “This Side of the Line”, the subject of false confessions and why someone might confess to a crime they never committed.
The Reid technique, hailed by law enforcement, stands at the forefront of interrogation methods aiming to coerce confessions out of people. This method is often seen in television shows and movies. It involves lying, whether about evidence or witness, or both, a plethora of questions, and being trapped in a locked room, with nobody who believes you. The law enforcement can say whatever they want to you, do they do. They tell you so many times what you are and what you did that you begin to think Why does it matter since they already think I did?
Additionally, enforcement can prompt a hypothetical of how the individual could have pulled it off. This enables police to work backward. With a culprit and mode already “discovered,” it is easy to allow biases to skew further involvement. This, along with other bombarding questions causes a very nerve-wracking atmosphere full of stress. This too can contribute to people’s likelihood of confessing.
This is what happened to Marty Tankleff. One day, Marty came home to his parents brutally murdered, and instead of sympathy, he was met with relentless pressure and manipulation by law enforcement. The lead detective coerced a confession out of Marty based on deceitful tactics and lies, playing on Marty’s being a teenager. Marty ultimately served 18 years of his 50-year sentence before exoneration.
The troubling fact about false confessions that has been shown here is how deeper factors within the psyche can attribute false confessions. This should continue to be a topic of lengthy discussion within psychology and within the justice system. Wrongful convictions ruin people’s lives, which is why although there have been many just convictions by these techniques, they should be employed in better, more likely situations.
(380)