{"id":5214,"date":"2020-09-25T20:57:41","date_gmt":"2020-09-26T00:57:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/?p=5214"},"modified":"2020-09-25T20:57:41","modified_gmt":"2020-09-26T00:57:41","slug":"giving-rosalind-franklin-some-credit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/2020\/09\/25\/giving-rosalind-franklin-some-credit\/","title":{"rendered":"Giving Rosalind Franklin Some Credit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As we look back on our history we see how science has changed our civilization over time. The increase of knowledge has fueled every country in this ongoing battle of who knows the most. As people say, \u201cKnowledge is power,\u201d and countries all<\/span><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> around the world believe in this statement. Scientists have always been some of the world&#8217;s most well-known figures because they have changed so much about the way we live.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As we look into the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) field, we notice an overwhelming amount of attention is drawn towards male scientists. For example, a study in 2016 shows that the ratio of STEM graduates was 37% female and 63% male (Stockwell). Considering that those are recent numbers as we go back into our history the female percentage would go drastically down.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Despite the overwhelming amount of men in this field, the contribution of women is still extremely substantial. As we look back on the many women scientists in our history we see scientists such as Marie Curie, Lise Meitner, Rachel Carson, and Rosalind Franklin. Rosalind Franklin is a scientist well known for her double helix discovery in DNA, and not receiving credit, and having her work either stolen or miscredited by scientists Jim Watson, Francis Crick, and Maurice Wilkins.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rosalind Franklin was born on July 25th, 1920, and passed away on April 16th, 1958. She was an English chemist and X-ray crystallographer. Franklin attended St Paul\u2019s Girls School and then continued her education at the University of Cambridge. She worked primarily with DNA and studied the molecular structures of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), RNA (ribonucleic acid), viruses, coal, and graphite. Although, her biggest discovery was the structure of DNA and the double helix structure (Cobb).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">To give some context to Franklin\u2019s biggest finding, in late February of 1953, Franklin, 33 at the time, had the idea that the structure of DNA had two chains. She had realized that DNA existed in two forms because she had understood by this point that the molecule had its phosphate groups on the outside. Franklin had taken an X-ray photograph of a DNA crystal that showed the helical structure. It is said that two weeks after she came up with that finding, Watson, and Crick had found her unpublished evidence, and created a model of the DNA as a double helix based on Franklin\u2019s research. Watson went on to admit that he did take evidence towards the double helix discovery from Franklin saying, \u201c\u2018Rosy, of course, did not directly give us her data. For that matter, no one at King&#8217;s realized they were in our hands.\u2019\u201d (Maddox). Watson went on to win the Nobel Prize in 1962 which he shared with Crick and Wilkins. Although Franklin, who had already passed away in 1958, was not credited and did not receive any recognition towards her findings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This disrespect towards women in STEM has been an ongoing issue in our society. Women are often represented as \u201cweaker\u201d than men and were often taken advantage of. As seen with Franklin her evidence was stolen from her and some of her most important findings were miscredited. Although Franklin will forever be remembered as the scientist who did not receive credit for her discovery of the double helix, she will also serve as a symbol for women around the world showing that it is possible for women to be a part of STEM.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Credits<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Maddox, Brenda. \u201cThe Double Helix and the &#8216;Wronged Heroine&#8217;.\u201d <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nature News<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Nature Publishing Group, www.nature.com\/articles\/nature01399.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cThe Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1962.\u201d <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">NobelPrize.org<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, www.nobelprize.org\/prizes\/medicine\/1962\/summary\/.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cRosalind Franklin.\u201d <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Wikipedia<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Wikimedia Foundation, 19 Sept. 2020, en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rosalind_Franklin.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cSexism in Science: Did Watson and Crick Really Steal Rosalind Franklin&#8217;s Data?\u201d <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Guardian<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Guardian News and Media, 23 June 2015, www.theguardian.com\/science\/2015\/jun\/23\/sexism-in-science-did-watson-and-crick-really-steal-rosalind-franklins-data.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Stockwell, Carly. \u201cWomen vs. Men in STEM Degrees: Do We Have a Problem?\u201d <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Inside College Factual<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Inside College Factual, 27 Oct. 2017, inside.collegefactual.com\/stories\/women-vs-men-in-stem-degrees.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As we look back on our history we see how science has changed our civilization over time. The increase of knowledge has fueled every country &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11350,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[469613],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5214"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11350"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5214"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5214\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5216,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5214\/revisions\/5216"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/st112a-fall20\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}