{"id":488,"date":"2015-10-06T17:14:51","date_gmt":"2015-10-06T21:14:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/?p=488"},"modified":"2015-10-06T17:16:13","modified_gmt":"2015-10-06T21:16:13","slug":"the-idiosyncrasy-of-the-aeroir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/2015\/10\/06\/the-idiosyncrasy-of-the-aeroir\/","title":{"rendered":"The Idiosyncrasy of the Aeroir"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In Rebecca Harding&#8217;s short story &#8220;Life in the Iron Mills,&#8221; Harding writes, &#8220;The idiosyncrasy of this town is smoke.&#8221; I originally read this story nearly two years ago, yet this line still resonates with me. The concept that we one symbol, word, image can define a place captivates me. As I traveled on my global gap year, I began attempting to identify the idiosyncrasies of each town; suffice it to say I could not fulfill the task. I soon realized just how difficult it is to summarize an entire place&#8211;its culture, its people, its essence&#8211;in one word. As Nicola Twilley began her discussion of terroir and aeroir, I wondered if perhaps she had a better sentiment. Maybe language does not suffice. Maybe taste is the answer. I am so intrigued by this gastronomy; I wonder if smell can transport us to a far away memory, can taste transport us to a far away place? What emotional value comes from both terroir and aeroir?\u00a0Individual experience is so varied, which perhaps make writing the idiosyncrasy of a town subjective. But, is air, smell, taste all subject to equal subjectivity? Or are these senses exempt from the distortion of the individual lived experience?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Rebecca Harding&#8217;s short story &#8220;Life in the Iron Mills,&#8221; Harding writes, &#8220;The idiosyncrasy of this town is smoke.&#8221; I originally read this story nearly two years ago, yet this line still resonates with me. The concept that we one&#8230; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/2015\/10\/06\/the-idiosyncrasy-of-the-aeroir\/\">Continue Reading &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6960,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[249054],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/488"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6960"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=488"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/488\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":491,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/488\/revisions\/491"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/humanslashnature\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}