{"id":468,"date":"2018-09-19T22:56:28","date_gmt":"2018-09-20T02:56:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/?p=468"},"modified":"2018-09-19T22:56:28","modified_gmt":"2018-09-20T02:56:28","slug":"look-again-chapters-406","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/2018\/09\/19\/look-again-chapters-406\/","title":{"rendered":"Look Again! Chapters 406"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Throughout my academic career, I have encountered Sigmund Freud several times. However, his \u201cpenis argument\u201d was new to me. I had never heard of this part of his Oedipus vs. Electra complex, and found his argument to be very\u2026quaint. It was so interesting to learn how easily he categorized the world. For someone who had such advanced ideas in the 19<sup>th<\/sup> century that emphasized the experience and psyche of the unconscious individual, it is contradictory to have such a narrow opinion of male and female gender and sexuality. As D\u2019Alleva says, his theories \u201creflect Freud\u2019s experience of nineteenth-century bourgeois male culture, not the range of human experience.\u201d He claims to understand and speak for all, but ends up missing so much. Freud places the penis at the very center of all of humanity\u2019s sexuality, what we all apparently strive to have\/attain, which consequently belittles the female clitoris and vagina. Which really, just exhibits the pattern and power of \u2018the man\u2019, something that has become such a dominant theme throughout our history.<\/p>\n<p>It is interesting to study Freud within the discipline of art history, as he is usually more relevant within the fields of psychology, political science and philosophy. Additionally, his low opinion of women and their sexuality is an interesting component to add to art history, which already struggles with the lack of great female artists. So many women were denied access to education and artistic training, mainly because they were not wealthy white men. As D\u2019Alleva mentions, Freud has had many critics for the great majority of his theories, but yet some of his arguments in art history remain uncontested, as he attempted to psychoanalytically explain great artists like Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci. Freud\u2019s approach to art history consists of psychoanalyzing the artist\u2019s intentions, personality and works. Most art historians do not use Freud\u2019s pathographical approach (with good reason), as it is incredibly difficult already to figure out an artist\u2019s conscious intentions, never mind their <em>unconscious <\/em>intentions. However, it is certainly intriguing to read Freud\u2019s attempts to understand these complex artists.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Throughout my academic career, I have encountered Sigmund Freud several times. However, his \u201cpenis argument\u201d was new to me. I had never heard of this part of his Oedipus vs. Electra complex, and found his argument to be very\u2026quaint. It was so interesting to learn how easily he categorized the world. For someone who had &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/2018\/09\/19\/look-again-chapters-406\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Look Again! Chapters 406&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8041,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8041"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=468"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":469,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468\/revisions\/469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}