{"id":455,"date":"2018-09-14T10:47:29","date_gmt":"2018-09-14T14:47:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/?p=455"},"modified":"2018-09-14T10:47:29","modified_gmt":"2018-09-14T14:47:29","slug":"look-again-1-3-post-discussion-reflection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/2018\/09\/14\/look-again-1-3-post-discussion-reflection\/","title":{"rendered":"Look Again! 1-3 Post-Discussion Reflection"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Post-Discussion Reflection<\/p>\n<p>Following yesterday&#8217;s discussion and presentations in the seminar, I wish to highlight and reflect on several key takeaways. Of importance was the attention given to key terms and jargon, the differences and interconnectedness between &#8220;theory&#8221; as framework and &#8220;methodology&#8221; as practice, and the dynamic and reciprocal relationship between theory and object.<\/p>\n<p>As observed in class, critical theories respond in varied ways to different works of art; some theories, when applied to a given work of art, may not stimulate inquiry or discourse as well as others. For example, only some artworks may respond to an iconographic approach.\u00a0In particular, I found the discussion surrounding Semiotics and Word and Image studies to be engaging and relevant to our seminar&#8217;s focus. De Saussure&#8217;s work on signs and systems will be crucial in research throughout this seminar. Through this theoretical approach, graffiti\u2013\u2013especially when both word\u00a0<em>and<\/em> image are present\u2013\u2013is a &#8220;signifier&#8221; and a visual index with spatial dynamics. &#8220;Decoding&#8221; the graffito via Word and Image and\/or Semiotic modalities may elucidate the ways in which graffiti is a form of discontinuous communication; the &#8220;signifier&#8221; references the &#8220;signified&#8221; and the word and image (and word\u00a0<em>as<\/em> image) are works of art.<\/p>\n<p>Understanding these critical theories will enable depth and new learning in my own research on graffiti\/street art markings of the <em>pa\u00f1uelo blanco<\/em> in Buenos Aires.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_456\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-456\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/files\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-14-at-10.33.17-AM.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-456\" src=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/files\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-14-at-10.33.17-AM-300x83.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"83\" srcset=\"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/files\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-14-at-10.33.17-AM-300x83.png 300w, https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/files\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-14-at-10.33.17-AM-768x213.png 768w, https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/files\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-14-at-10.33.17-AM-1024x285.png 1024w, https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/files\/2018\/09\/Screen-Shot-2018-09-14-at-10.33.17-AM.png 1144w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-456\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">CW, &#8220;Pa\u00f1uelo Blancos in Plaza de Mayo,&#8221; Buenos Aires, 2017.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>These markings can be understood as signifiers that reference the signified: the material white scarves (formerly diapers) worn by\u00a0las Madres de la Plaza de Mayo. The material white scarves, furthermore, reference another layer of symbolic meaning: memory, grief and injustice surrounding <em>los desaparecidos.\u00a0<\/em>From our discussion surrounding Word and Image and Semiotics, I see how illuminating these critical theories will be throughout our research on graffiti this Seminar.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Post-Discussion Reflection Following yesterday&#8217;s discussion and presentations in the seminar, I wish to highlight and reflect on several key takeaways. Of importance was the attention given to key terms and jargon, the differences and interconnectedness between &#8220;theory&#8221; as framework and &#8220;methodology&#8221; as practice, and the dynamic and reciprocal relationship between theory and object. As observed &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/2018\/09\/14\/look-again-1-3-post-discussion-reflection\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Look Again! 1-3 Post-Discussion Reflection&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6919,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/455"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6919"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=455"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":457,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/455\/revisions\/457"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/graffiti-fall2018\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}