{"id":519,"date":"2013-11-21T21:12:08","date_gmt":"2013-11-22T02:12:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/?p=519"},"modified":"2013-12-18T19:30:22","modified_gmt":"2013-12-19T00:30:22","slug":"and-the-goose-ran-away-with-the-worm-keyword-mnemonic-as-a-study-strategy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/2013\/11\/21\/and-the-goose-ran-away-with-the-worm-keyword-mnemonic-as-a-study-strategy\/","title":{"rendered":"And the Goose Ran Away With the Worm: Keyword Mnemonic as a Study Strategy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There exists a myriad of study strategies available for students to use in their academic endeavors. \u00a0One of the more imaginative strategies is keyword mnemonic. In this strategy students connect the material with another keyword to better remember information. This is most commonly used for foreign language vocabulary. For example, the Spanish word for worm is <i>gusano <\/i>and a possible keyword for remembering this is \u201cgoose\u201d. The student then would create interactive imagery between the vocabulary word and the keyword, such as imagining a goose running away with a giant worm in its beak.\u00a0 This interactive image should help distinguish the vocab word from other possible objects in the image, hence why the worm is \u201cgiant.\u201d It is presumed that by creating a vivid memorable image in the student\u2019s mind, that when presented with the Spanish word <i>gusano <\/i>he\/she will recall the scene and easily know the Spanish word\u2019s meaning. \u00a0Other material keyword mnemonic has been found useful for includes obscure English and science vocabulary, states and their capitals, medical terminology, and people\u2019s names and accomplishments.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The idea of keyword mnemonic sounds promising, how could you forget such ridiculous images? The strategy has benefited students of many different ages and abilities. In a study of fifth graders using the technique to learn Spanish vocabulary students who used the technique preformed substantially better on tests of the vocab than did control groups asked to use their own study strategies (Levin, Pressley, McCormick, Miller, and Shriberg, 1979). Students with learning disabilities have shown benefits from the technique as well. When used in studies where the same group of students is tested for immediate recall and then a delayed recall the group using the technique showed improved performance over control groups.\u00a0 These results would suggest keyword mnemonic is an effective study technique, but there is another side to the story.<\/p>\n<p>The keyword mnemonic strategy has its limitations. Although the previously mentioned study including delayed recall would suggest that the technique would be effective for durable retention of information, a flaw in the experimental methods just made this seem to be the case. That study used the same students in the immediate and delayed recall conditions, the retrieval practice they received from the earlier immediate test (not the keyword mnemonic strategy) most likely helped them recall information in the later delay test. \u00a0A separate study (Wang et al., 1992) using <i>different <\/i>groups of students for the immediate and delayed recall showed improvement only in the immediate recall group when using keyword mnemonic, the delayed recall keyword mnemonic group actually preformed worst than the control group using rote repetition as a study technique. Many studies of the keyword mnemonic technique also use keywords provided by the experimenter, it may be more difficult for students (especially young students) to come up with their own keywords to use. Teachers or textbook designers could create keywords for students, though this could take more time and effort than the technique\u2019s utility is worth. In studies of high school and college students the technique did not result in improved performance like it did with fifth graders. The material being learned must be somewhat keyword friendly in order for the technique to be useful as well. It may not be usable on more complex subjects (Dunlosky et al., 2013).<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the flaws in this technique seem to outweigh the benefits in most classroom settings. Other more effective strategies are known for study and therefore are more commonly used in the classroom and by students.<\/p>\n<p>Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., &amp; Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. <i>Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14<\/i>(1), 4-58.<\/p>\n<p>Levin, J. R., Pressley, M., McCormick, C. B., Miller, G. E., &amp; Shriberg, L. K. (1979). Assessing the classroom potential of the keyword method. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology, 71<\/i>(5), 583-594.<\/p>\n<p>Wang, A. Y., Thomas, M. H., &amp; Ouellette, J. A. (1992). Keyword mnemonic and retention of second-language vocabulary words. <i>Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, <\/i>520-528<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There exists a myriad of study strategies available for students to use in their academic endeavors. \u00a0One of the more imaginative strategies is keyword mnemonic. In this strategy students connect the material with another keyword to better remember information. This is most commonly used for foreign language vocabulary. For example, the Spanish word for worm [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4205,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[60348,80215],"tags":[112,130444],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4205"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=519"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":932,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519\/revisions\/932"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}