{"id":3896,"date":"2018-04-24T14:45:31","date_gmt":"2018-04-24T18:45:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/?p=3896"},"modified":"2020-02-07T09:18:26","modified_gmt":"2020-02-07T14:18:26","slug":"that-band-is-really-cool-but-i-swear-its-everywhere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/2018\/04\/24\/that-band-is-really-cool-but-i-swear-its-everywhere\/","title":{"rendered":"That Band is Really Cool, But I Swear It&#8217;s Everywhere"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Have you ever scrolled through Spotify and discovered a band you like?&nbsp; Have you ever started listening to all its songs and suddenly you start hearing it all the time on the radio and seeing advertisements for its new album or concert? Or maybe you just found out you&#8217;re pregnant and see parents with their kids everywhere you go? While it\u2019s easy to think that maybe you just discover bands that magically and suddenly get really big or that maybe more people suddenly have kids these days, you\u2019re actually probably experiencing what is called the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon or frequency illusion.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3907\" style=\"width: 302px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/78.media.tumblr.com\/5aa7306276532565d463e59a42824e15\/tumblr_o601be5J161su40qeo1_500.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3907\" class=\"wp-image-3907\" src=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/tumblr_o601be5J161su40qeo1_500.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"292\" height=\"248\"><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3907\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Kids are everywhere! Or so you think.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The frequency illusion occurs when a person experiences something, like finding a song he or she likes on Spotify or becoming pregnant, and then afterwards believes that the experience or phenomenon happens all the time. So why does this occur? Well, there are two cognitive processes that are involved in creating the frequency illusion: selective attention and confirmation bias (Zwicky, 2006).&nbsp;<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Selective attention is the idea that we mostly choose what we want to pay attention to once we filter out a lot of the other environmental information that is irrelevant or unnecessary. It\u2019s impossible for us to pay attention to every single thing in our environment, which basically means that attention has a limited capacity, so we have to focus on and allocate attentional resources to what we think is important in our environment (McBride &amp; Cutting, 2015). While this means we won\u2019t be overwhelmed by environmental information, which is a good thing, it also means that attention spent on one task <a href=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/2013\/03\/11\/cell-phone-use-driving-and-limited-attention\/\">limits attention<\/a> for and impedes performance in another task (Sanbonmatsu et al., 2016). In fact, we are all <a href=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/2017\/04\/17\/why-does-everything-bad-happen-to-me-attentional-bias\/\">selectively attending<\/a> to information, even when we don\u2019t think we are. This is a problem because it can lead us to receiving a lot of information about one thing because we decided to pay attention to that one thing as opposed to something else (Graf &amp; Aday, 2008)!<\/p>\n<p>Now, confirmation bias is a little bit different from plain old selective attention.&nbsp; Instead of just selectively attending to any information in the environment that seems important or relevant, the confirmation bias occurs when individuals selectively attend to information that confirms their beliefs while simultaneously ignoring information that could challenge or provide evidence against those beliefs.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3904\" style=\"width: 380px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn-images-1.medium.com\/max\/800\/1*yN2Xhv-M5PPerWzDVNt3sw.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3904\" class=\"wp-image-3904\" src=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/1yN2Xhv-M5PPerWzDVNt3sw-580x207.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"370\" height=\"132\" srcset=\"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/1yN2Xhv-M5PPerWzDVNt3sw-580x207.jpg 580w, https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/1yN2Xhv-M5PPerWzDVNt3sw-768x274.jpg 768w, https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/1yN2Xhv-M5PPerWzDVNt3sw.jpg 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 370px) 100vw, 370px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3904\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Confirmation Bias at it&#8217;s finest!<\/p><\/div>\n<p>This means that we attend to things selectively based on our priorities (Rajsic et al., 2015). When we believe that we see or hear something over and over, we prioritize paying attention to that thing as opposed to something else in order to confirm the belief that we see or hear that particular thing everywhere. This can happen when something changes our lives, like getting pregnant, and afterwards we see that tons of people have kids everywhere we go. Kids and pregnancy are now relevant to us and because we have created the belief that kids are everywhere; We selectively look for families with kids instead of families without kids, making it seem as if there are more families with kids than there actually are. The danger with <a href=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/2017\/04\/17\/3310\/\">confirmation bias<\/a> is that avoiding or ignoring information that counters our beliefs can warp our opinions to the extreme about things (Charness &amp; Dave, 2017). This warping of opinions affects all sorts of people like teachers when grading students work, researchers regarding the data that supports their hypothesis, and even doctors and incorrect diagnoses (Charness &amp; Dave, 2017). The nature of confirmation bias is that it\u2019s partially manipulated by top-down processing. Top down processing involves expectations, prior knowledge, and assumptions. Since top down processing is fundamental to a person\u2019s opinions, perceptions and beliefs, it also plays a significant part in confirmation bias.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3897\" style=\"width: 294px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/cdn3.techadvisor.co.uk\/cmsdata\/features\/3645111\/best-spotify-tips-and-tricks-banner_thumb800.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3897\" class=\"wp-image-3897\" src=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/Unknown.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"284\" height=\"159\"><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3897\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Spotify is a place where one can discover and listen to music.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>So now that we\u2019ve established what the two cognitive processes involved are, let\u2019s talk about how these two functions work to create the frequency illusion. Think back to the music example. So, you\u2019ve just found a new song on Spotify, and due to selective attention, you decide to listen and pay attention to the song whenever you have free time because you like it and it\u2019s now relevant to you. As soon as you found it on Spotify and listened to it, you made the song important because you liked it and therefore you begin to listen for the song whenever you hear music without realizing it, making it stand out when you do happen to hear it at the gym or on the radio. The more you hear the song, the more confirmation bias comes into play. Your brain then says, \u201csee the song is popular and is playing everywhere, even more than other songs\u201d which reinforces that belief over and over again. Remember that the song isn\u2019t actually suddenly everywhere, and that there\u2019s plenty of times where other songs are playing. However, confirmation bias pushes that opposing information aside because it doesn\u2019t coincide with the created belief that a particular song is suddenly playing everywhere.<\/p>\n<p>Now before you think your brain is tricking you all the time, you should know that there are other factors that emphasize the frequency illusion and benefit from it. During elections, many candidates use all sorts of advertising to push their name to the front of your mind, which can make you think about something or someone a lot. In these cases, you are actually seeing that thing more often than other things.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3900\" style=\"width: 207px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.yourdictionary.com\/images\/definitions\/lg\/12442.political-party.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3900\" class=\"wp-image-3900\" src=\"http:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/12442.political-party.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"197\" height=\"197\" srcset=\"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/12442.political-party.jpg 250w, https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/files\/2018\/04\/12442.political-party-150x150.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 197px) 100vw, 197px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3900\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Websites and search engines look at your history and tailor advertisements towards your preferences.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Candidates can campaign through advertisements and signs hoping that it makes you consider voting for them because you see it more often. On top of that, if you read more articles about one political party, many websites and apps use your search history to bombard you with information related to your searches, causing more information and articles about that political party to show up. This goes for anything, not just for political information. Have you ever bought a pair of shoes online, and then see random advertisements for those exact shoes on completely unrelated websites? Well now you know how it happens! This experience isn\u2019t necessarily the frequency illusion alone; It\u2019s repetitive, direct to consumer advertising that parallels and can sometimes emphasize or combine with the frequency illusion to create the experience.<\/p>\n<p>Although advertising can contribute to information becoming widespread, don\u2019t forget about those cognitive processes that actively encourage and contribute to the belief that something appears often! Now you know that selective attention and confirmation bias are enabling the frequency illusion to occur. Trust me, just because you might be pregnant, might not necessarily mean that suddenly more people have kids!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">References<\/p>\n<p>Charness, G., &amp; Dave, C. (2017). Confirmation bias with motivated beliefs.&nbsp;<em>Games and Economic Behavior<\/em>,&nbsp;<em>104<\/em>1-23. doi:10.1016\/j.geb.2017.02.015<\/p>\n<p>Graf, J., &amp; Aday, S. (2008). Selective attention to online political information.&nbsp;<em>Journal of Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media<\/em>,&nbsp;<em>52<\/em>(1), 86-100. doi:10.1080\/08838150701820874<\/p>\n<p>McBride, D. M., &amp; Cutting, J. C. (2015).&nbsp;<em>Cognitive psychology: Theory, process, and methodology<\/em>. SAGE Publications.<\/p>\n<p>Rajsic, J., Wilson, D. E., &amp; Pratt, J. (2015). Confirmation bias in visual search.&nbsp;<em>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance<\/em>,&nbsp;<em>41<\/em>(5), 1353-1364.doi:10.1037\/xhp0000090<\/p>\n<p>Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Strayer, D.L., Biondi, F. et al. (2016) Cell-phone use diminishes self awareness of impaired driving. <em>Psychonomic Bullitin and Review<\/em>, 23: 617. doi:10.3758\/s13423-015-0922-4<\/p>\n<p>Zwicky, A. M. (2006). Why are we so illuded?. Retrieved May 22, 2018 from http:\/\/www-csli.stanford. edu\/~ zwicky\/LSA07illude.abst.pdf.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Have you ever scrolled through Spotify and discovered a band you like?&nbsp; Have you ever started listening to all its songs and suddenly you start hearing it all the time on the radio and seeing advertisements for its new album or concert? Or maybe you just found out you&#8217;re pregnant and see parents with their [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8910,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[80216,266316],"tags":[54559,150439,266291],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3896"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8910"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3896"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3896\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5412,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3896\/revisions\/5412"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/web.colby.edu\/cogblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}